Re: Problem with PERL function
- From: michaelzhao <mzhao1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:33:59 -0700
On Jun 29, 2:16 pm, use...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 28, 3:03 pm, michaelzhao <mzh...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jerkoff
Don't it just annoy you when you take the time to read someone's post
and make a reply, and then this n00b goes off and flames a respected
group regular who was only trying to be helpful. It really makes you
sorry you ever read or responded to the post.
* Ploink *
--
The best way to get a good answer is to ask a good question.
David Filmer (http://DavidFilmer.com)
Ha! Lets see... I was grateful for everyone elses suggestions. But
tell me, besides informing me that "PERL" was actually "Perl", he did
not help me at all with my problem besides giving me the response that
I needed the "$" variable.
Other people helped me a good deal giving relevant and educational
discussion and I am grateful to them. So, I don't care if he is a
regular or if hes a Perl god for that matter. The post he made was
neither helpful nor educational... besides me learning the "Perl" of
course. Oh, and next time I'll post a short script.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with PERL function
- From: Tad McClellan
- Re: Problem with PERL function
- From: Keith Keller
- Re: Problem with PERL function
- References:
- Problem with PERL function
- From: michaelzhao
- Re: Problem with PERL function
- From: usenet
- Re: Problem with PERL function
- From: jgraber
- Re: Problem with PERL function
- From: michaelzhao
- Re: Problem with PERL function
- From: usenet
- Problem with PERL function
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple fork examples
- Next by Date: Re: lurking
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with PERL function
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with PERL function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading