Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Florian Kaufmann <sensorflo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:38:24 -0800 (PST)
precedence". IMO, it is an indication of the sad state of affair with
Perl documentation that there is no place in perl docs which lists all
of them...
Thats what I think too, although I wouldn't go as far as to label it
sad. I would like to have a book for Perl what the book "The C++
Programming Language" is for C++. Something very clear, very concise,
clearly naming things and give things clear semantics. "Programming
Perl" is a good book, but in my opinion by far not as concise as "The C
++ Programming Language". To be fair I am a Perl novice, and it might
be to early to make such a statement.
I am writing a documentation for Perl for myself. I hope it turns out
more concise, at least in my view, as the documentation about Perl I
have currently in my hands. I am writing it to learn Perl, to order my
thoughts, my understanding of Perl. It has a lot of positive side
effects though
- I learn Perl pretty well
- I learn LaTeX a bit (i decided to write the document in latex)
- I learn how to efficiently edit LaTex files in Emacs
- I learn more about meta syntax notations. I am using an own syntax
notation which I created on this occasion (also to describe bash
scripts), since I find EBNF and the like quite cumbersome. It's more
for the fun of it, to have something I personally like better, not to
have something which is better by objective means.
Flo
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Charlton Wilbur
- Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Joost Diepenmaat
- Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- References:
- (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Florian Kaufmann
- Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Florian Kaufmann
- Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Florian Kaufmann
- Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- From: Ilya Zakharevich
- (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- Prev by Date: Re: How can I name my scalar with a for loop?
- Next by Date: Re: How can I name my scalar with a for loop?
- Previous by thread: Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- Next by thread: Re: (1)[0] ok but not 1[0]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|