Re: new "state" variables... nest properly??
- From: Abble <grg2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:03:39 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 27, 5:43 pm, Ben Morrow <b...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This section 'fails': the second time through, $Var is already set,
since it preserves its value from last time Outer was called.
Ben
yes, the "set locals to empty" bizness goes away, but it seems mid-
level variables now work.
In many cases I'm happy to have tio initialize locals and on exit
leave dangling variables if I get the benefit of being able to access
mid-level vars with impunity. It *seems* like we now have this.
.
- References:
- new "state" variables... nest properly??
- From: Abble
- Re: new "state" variables... nest properly??
- From: Ben Morrow
- new "state" variables... nest properly??
- Prev by Date: Re: new "state" variables... nest properly??
- Next by Date: Re: FAQ 5.16 Is there a leak/bug in glob()?
- Previous by thread: Re: new "state" variables... nest properly??
- Next by thread: Re: new "state" variables... nest properly??
- Index(es):