Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: "Gordon Etly" <get@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:15:52 -0700
John Bokma wrote:
"Gordon Etly" <get@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If someone is a good programmer with the Perl language, does
it really make a difference how they spell it as long as they know
what they are doing?
IMO a good Perl programmer knows the difference between Perl and perl,
and knows when to use which one.
There you go again, completely ignoring what 'man perl' and 'perldoc
perl' say:
I would think a good programmer would also have read Perl's own
documentation, which validates the usage of Perl as an acronym:
$ perldoc perl | head -n 10
PERL(1) User Contributed Perl Documentation PERL(1)
NAME
perl - Practical Extraction and Report Language
^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Even http://perldoc.perl.org/perl.html says:
"perl - Practical Extraction and Report Language"
--
G.Etly
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Frank Seitz
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- References:
- perl should be improved and perl6
- From: jm
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Dr.Ruud
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: V.Ronans
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: John Bokma
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Gordon Etly
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: John Bokma
- perl should be improved and perl6
- Prev by Date: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Next by Date: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Previous by thread: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Next by thread: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|