Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:02:13 -0700
Abigail wrote:
No, it's not.It certainly does to that someone - and indeed to others as well. One need not ask for permission to think.
It would be an acronym if he came up with 'Practical Extraction and Report Language' *FIRST*, then took the starting letters to make a word.
But he didn't. He came up with 'Pe(a)rl', and given that name, constructed 'Practical Extraction and Report Language'. Which makes the latter a derivate of the first, making 'Practical Extraction and Report Language' an Acrostic of 'Perl' (instead of Perl being an acronym).
Dodge doesn't become an acronym because someone came up with 'Darn Old Dirty Gas Eater'.
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
The nice thing about Standards is there are so many to choose from. - Michael Santovec
- References:
- perl should be improved and perl6
- From: jm
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Gordon Etly
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Frank Seitz
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Gordon Etly
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Abigail
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Gordon Etly
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: A. Sinan Unur
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Gordon Etly
- Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- From: Abigail
- perl should be improved and perl6
- Prev by Date: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Next by Date: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Previous by thread: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Next by thread: Re: perl should be improved and perl6
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|