Re: Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- From: xhoster@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 01 May 2008 15:18:10 GMT
Peter Scott <Peter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 01 May 2008 12:00:32 +0100, bugbear wrote:
Lars Eighner wrote:
Will perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
They'll be hellish backwards compatibility issues
if it isn't!
Backwards compatibility with what?
Are you thinking that Perl 6 is intended to be backwards compatible with
Perl 5? It isn't, and it won't be. The runtime will be able to use Perl
5 modules, but that's a different story.
What is the difference between that, and being backwards compatible?
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate
this fact.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- From: Lars Eighner
- Re: Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- References:
- Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- From: Lars Eighner
- Re: Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- From: bugbear
- Re: Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- From: Peter Scott
- Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- Prev by Date: Re: Stuffing @users into $self->{'users'}
- Next by Date: Re: Stuffing @users into $self->{'users'}
- Previous by thread: Re: Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- Next by thread: Re: Will Perl 6 be usable as a procedure language?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|