Re: FAQ 4.2 Why is int() broken?
- From: John W Kennedy <jwkenne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:00:03 -0400
Martijn Lievaart wrote:
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:32:41 +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2008-07-30 19:50, John W Kennedy <jwkenne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Peter J. Holzer wrote:z/Architecture isn't exactly mass-market.On 2008-07-30 14:03, John W Kennedy <jwkenne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:And z/Architecture.However, Intel is dragging its feet on adding decimal floating point,If there truly is demand for this, then that's good for IBM. They can
per IEEE-754r.
sell lots of Power6 boxes.
Well, not mass market, but gaining in popularity pretty fast. You won't have one at home presumably, but all gigs I worked at the past ten years had several of those. Yes several, running multiple virtual machines.
OTOH, those virtual machines typically ran AIX (or linux) and did not take advantage (AFAIK) of the decimal floating point at all.
But the decimal floating point feature is much less than ten years old, so it's natural that it's not going to get much use until languages start to be updated to support it. It's going to take a while in typed languages, and untyped languages like Perl and Ruby are going to need some philosophical examination. PL/I is about the only language that was prepared.
--
John W. Kennedy
"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected."
-- G. K. Chesterton
.
- References:
- Re: FAQ 4.2 Why is int() broken?
- From: Peter J. Holzer
- Re: FAQ 4.2 Why is int() broken?
- From: Martijn Lievaart
- Re: FAQ 4.2 Why is int() broken?
- Prev by Date: Calling Another Application From Perl
- Next by Date: Re: Calling Another Application From Perl
- Previous by thread: Re: FAQ 4.2 Why is int() broken?
- Next by thread: Re: FAQ 4.2 Why is int() broken?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|