Re: subprocesses lifecycle
- From: Eric Pozharski <whynot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:19:26 +0300
Peter J. Holzer <hjp-usenet2@xxxxxx> wrote:
*SKIP*
terminate. But since you didn't call $pipe->autoflush the child won't
actually try to write to the pipe until the buffer (4kB on Linux, 8kB on
most other unixes) is full - that will be after about 75 or 150 lines,
respectively.
That's what I'd messed up, line oriented at surface while buffered in
depth. Thanks, now I feel much better.
--
Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
.
- References:
- subprocesses lifecycle
- From: Matthieu Imbert
- Re: subprocesses lifecycle
- From: Eric Pozharski
- Re: subprocesses lifecycle
- From: Matthieu Imbert
- Re: subprocesses lifecycle
- From: Peter J. Holzer
- subprocesses lifecycle
- Prev by Date: FAQ 8.19 Why doesn't my sockets program work under System V (Solaris)? What does the error message "Protocol not supported" mean?
- Next by Date: Re: Multiple processes and tie'd files
- Previous by thread: Re: subprocesses lifecycle
- Next by thread: Re: subprocesses lifecycle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|