Re: Circular lists
- From: Chris Mattern <syscjm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:32:04 -0600
On 2009-01-16, Rasmus Villemoes <burner+usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
sln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:Most statiticians set a lower bound of 0.95 for general "reasonably
how many people in a room does it take to statistically almost
guarantee 2 people will have the same birth date (day-month) out of
365 days/year?
Answer: 26
That's the number of people making the probability of at least two
people sharing a birthday > 0.59. That is certainly not the same as
"statistically almost guarantee", whatever that means. 23 people make
the probability > 0.5.
certain" purposes. Anything lower than that is usually accounted as
insufficiently reliable for almost any purposes where you don't want to
gamble on being wrong. Many purposes require greater certainty, of course.
To get probablility > 0.95, you need 47 people. For p > 0.99, you need
57. p > 0.999, 70.
--
Christopher Mattern
NOTICE
Thank you for noticing this new notice
Your noticing it has been noted
And will be reported to the authorities
.
- References:
- Circular lists
- From: gamo
- Re: Circular lists
- From: cartercc
- Re: Circular lists
- From: Jürgen Exner
- Re: Circular lists
- From: sln
- Re: Circular lists
- From: Rasmus Villemoes
- Circular lists
- Prev by Date: Re: fastest way to allocate memory ?
- Next by Date: Re: opening a file
- Previous by thread: Re: Circular lists
- Next by thread: FAQ 3.21 How can I compile my Perl program into byte code or C?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|