PAR, pp and script packing
From: Asier (kasier_at_hispavista.com)
Date: 04/25/04
- Next message: Chris Whiting: "Re: [Slightly OT] Free version of MSFT VC++ now available"
- Previous message: Henry Law: "XML::Twig print to file gives expected results except for failure return value"
- Next in thread: Sisyphus: "Re: PAR, pp and script packing"
- Reply: Sisyphus: "Re: PAR, pp and script packing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 25 Apr 2004 08:16:48 -0700
Hi:
i have developed an applicattion in perl.
The problem i have, is that when i pack it normally with pp, and try
to use it in another different box( packed in redhat 9, fails in
mandrake 9), it gives me an error (icsh_len). I suppose that this
happends due to XS modules, becouse of the other modules i am using in
my script ... So i found in par's documentation that i could pack with
--multiarch option, and that implies -p (Create PAR archives only; do
not package to a standalone binary.).
But it is in this point where my mind gets confused. What can i do, if
i want to distribute my applicattion, accross any *linux* box, with
the modules i have downloaded and installed in my box?
What is the best way to pack in order to distribute my app, without
having to pack more things than necessary (supposing that standard
perl is installed in other possible linux boxes) and taking as less
space as possible?
i do not mind if it is a self standalone executable other a perl
archive with .par archives (supposing in this last case that par is
NOT installed in the other machines)
Thank you very very much
- Next message: Chris Whiting: "Re: [Slightly OT] Free version of MSFT VC++ now available"
- Previous message: Henry Law: "XML::Twig print to file gives expected results except for failure return value"
- Next in thread: Sisyphus: "Re: PAR, pp and script packing"
- Reply: Sisyphus: "Re: PAR, pp and script packing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
