Re: RFC: Net::IP::Correct

M.J.T. Guy wrote: 
What is your definition of "correct" here?    I would have expected the
result

     192.168.1.0/255.255.255.252
     192.168.1.4/255.255.255.254


Yes. That is correct :-)
Unfortunately, I was under the impression that one
couldn't create an IP block consisting of 2 addresses.

But I double-checked, and we can, so a .254 netmask
is possible.

I also propose to name this module Net::IP::Range::Split

Thanks

--
Rohan
.