Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- From: Jim Gibson <jgibson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:15:35 -0700
In article <20050826114651.214$KA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xhoster@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> "lee" <gary.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> BTW, @Deep_copy_stack doesn't seem to be lexically scoped. I dont' see how
> that would cause this particular problem, but I'd fix it anyway just in
> case.
Presumably, @Deep_copy_stack is scoped outside of the _deep_copy
subroutine so that recursive calls to _deep_copy will be accessing the
same version of @Deep_copy_stack to prevent infinite recursion in the
case of a circular reference. The OP has shown us only the _deep_copy
subroutine, so we can't tell.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- From: xhoster
- Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- References:
- UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- From: lee
- Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- From: Jim Gibson
- Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- From: lee
- Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- From: xhoster
- UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- Prev by Date: Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- Next by Date: Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- Previous by thread: Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- Next by thread: Re: UNIVERSAL::can function failing under heavy load
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|