Re: New module name? Pod::Pdf2

James E Keenan <jkeen_via_google@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In other words, he didn't think that Pod::Pdf in its current form was
worth a whole lot of effort. But he did lay out some direction for its
recuperation.

But do you think it's possible that your current Pod::Pdf2 module can
replace Pod::Pdf?

If so, I still would recommend to do so. If there is another way, but no
one is willing to pick it up CPAN has an outdated Pod::Pdf which can be
considered dead, and a new Pod::Pdf2, which might become obsolete one day,
and might be very well a better alternative to Pod::Pdf in the mean time.

The nice thing about modules is that the implementation is hidden, so if
Pod::Pdf2 can be made 1:1 compatible interface wise with Pod::Pdf, I would
certainly recommend to consider it an update to Pod::Pdf instead of a new
module that lives along Pod::Pdf.


--
John Bokma Freelance software developer
&
Experienced Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/
.

Relevant Pages