Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::YouTube

John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
What is your crusade about? Having them banned from YouTube to protect
them?

YouTube allows pornographic videos (among others) to be flagged, and
reserves to itself the right to remove said videos and/or ban the
people who posted them. The OP seems to be trying to make it easier
for people to flag videos as inappropiate, which action (the flagging,
though apparently not the making easier) is not only allowed, but
encouraged, by YouTube-- though I must confess that, offhand, I don't
see how it's any easier than clicking on the "Flag as Inappropriate"
link. Then again, I think a lot of things people do are harder than
necessary (such as running Windows), and I don't see a problem with
letting them do that anyway.

-=Eric
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::YouTube
    ... Eric Schwartz wrote: ... reserves to itself the right to remove said videos and/or ban the ... for people to flag videos as inappropiate, which action (the flagging, ... doubt if CPAN is a platform for Christian zealots. ...
    (comp.lang.perl.modules)
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::YouTube
    ... reserves to itself the right to remove said videos and/or ban the ... for people to flag videos as inappropiate, which action (the flagging, ... see how it's any easier than clicking on the "Flag as Inappropriate" ... necessary (such as running Windows), and I don't see a problem with ...
    (comp.lang.perl.modules)
  • Re: Milwaukee on DIME (link included)
    ... they banned the Columbus show because AOL has been promoting ... their featured videos from each night of the US tour. ... Dime initially wanted to ban the show unless the track that was used ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)