Re: WWW::YouTube has been technically corrected

From: Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:48:30 -0400

"Eric R. Meyers" <ermeyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

If anyone feels like John Bokma, that they need to respond, then my email
address is "Eric R. Meyers" <ermeyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, and you can leave the
technical issues to the technical forum.

Or, they can report your offtopic spam here to <abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx>.

I know which one I'll be doing.

Come and get me at my email address and leave the technical forum alone!

You need to follow your own advice here. Just describe your module's operation
and leave the off-topic non-technical business out of it. All your module needs
is a single paragraph:

"The WWW::YouTube module provides a Perl interface to youtube.com's
flagging API."

This is *NOT* the appropriate forum in which to discuss which particular flags
are appropriate for a given movie, the state of morality in the US, or any
particular value of $deity.

sherm--

--
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Hire me! My resume: http://www.dot-app.org
.

References:
- WWW::YouTube has been technically corrected
  - From: Eric R. Meyers

Prev by Date: Re: Installing IO::Socket::SSL on Win32?
Next by Date: Credentials and POST method with IO::Socket::SSL?
Previous by thread: WWW::YouTube has been technically corrected
Next by thread: Parsing return message from fetchmail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread