Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- From: "Matt Garrish" <mgarrish@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Aug 2006 14:39:35 -0700
Mumia W. wrote:
The readme for CPAN's Inline::Tcl says this:
This module is not related to the Inline::Tcl module, but it might be
valuable to have some compatibility between the two.
This sentence seems to suggest that there is another module
named Inline::Tcl somewhere. Is this true, and if so, where
can I find it?
I wouldn't hold any CPAN module to high grammatical standards. It would
be silly to give your module the same name as another, so I would
either chalk it up to a brain fart on the author's part when writing
the readme, or that this module was once called something else and took
over the Inline::Tcl title.
If you searched CPAN as the readme says, you'll see what's available.
Matt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- From: Mumia W.
- Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Prev by Date: Re: Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- Next by Date: Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Previous by thread: Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- Next by thread: Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Index(es):