Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- From: "Mumia W." <mumia.w.18.spam+nospam.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:09:22 GMT
On 08/23/2006 04:39 PM, Matt Garrish wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
The readme for CPAN's Inline::Tcl says this:
This module is not related to the Inline::Tcl module, but it might beThis sentence seems to suggest that there is another module
valuable to have some compatibility between the two.
named Inline::Tcl somewhere. Is this true, and if so, where
can I find it?
I wouldn't hold any CPAN module to high grammatical standards. It would
be silly to give your module the same name as another, so I would
either chalk it up to a brain fart on the author's part when writing
the readme, or that this module was once called something else and took
over the Inline::Tcl title.
If you searched CPAN as the readme says, you'll see what's available.
Matt
Yes, like you, I think it was just a mistake in the readme file.
Oh well, that pie-in-the-sky that I thought was an Inline::Tcl module that wasn't alpha software was actually just a cloud.
.
- References:
- Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- From: Matt Garrish
- Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Prev by Date: Re: Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- Next by Date: Help for first-timer module install
- Previous by thread: Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Next by thread: Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Index(es):