Re: Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- From: "Sisyphus" <sisyphus1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:18:02 +1000
"Ian" <ianmark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:r5mdnWoaWPbCVXHZnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Rob,
Yes it does terminate the process, otherwise I wouldn't care.
I expect that there's a way of avoiding that termination - but, like I said,
I can't really help.
have
I used CPAN because it did all the interdependencies for me so I wouldn't
to manually install every module.
Yes - that's the temptation it offers. The drawback is that you might have
to spend the time and energy you saved (and more) working out how to get
CPAN.pm to behave as you wish.
Mostly the depenedencies aren't too extensive - but there are exceptions,
and those exceptions will probably increase over time as authors assume that
CPAN.pm is being used, and it therefore doesn't matter if their module needs
20 other obscure modules, because the whole process is automated.
For some reason CPAN.pm really irritates me - to the extent that I just
cannot bring myself to use it. (That's mainly just me, however :-)
Cheers,
Rob
.
- References:
- Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- From: Ian
- Re: Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- From: Sisyphus
- Re: Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- From: Ian
- Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- Prev by Date: Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Next by Date: Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Previous by thread: Re: Invalid signature errors, CPAN, gpg
- Next by thread: Re: Inline::Tcl vs. Inline::Tcl
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|