Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: "Sisyphus" <sisyphus1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:45:26 +1000
"C B" <cb0@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:cb0-A748E4.20291528062007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here's what I found out after digging into this issue:
1. bignum is intended to be fully compatible with looks_like_number()
Where did you find that ?
Cheers,
Rob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: C B
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: Sisyphus
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: C B
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: Sisyphus
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: C B
- bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with validating XML (DTD or Schema) with PERL
- Next by Date: Re: GD::Graph with Image Map implementation question
- Previous by thread: Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- Next by thread: Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- Index(es):
