Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: C B <cb0@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:13:56 +0700
In article <4683d775$0$13997$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Sisyphus" <sisyphus1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here's what I found out after digging into this issue:
1. bignum is intended to be fully compatible with looks_like_number()
Where did you find that ?
Well, I started by reading this carefully:
http://perldoc.perl.org/bignum.html
Then I found a bunch of stuff like this:
http://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27606
Is there really any question as to the intent here?
CB
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: Sisyphus
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- References:
- bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: C B
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: Sisyphus
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: C B
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: Sisyphus
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: C B
- Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- From: Sisyphus
- bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with validating XML (DTD or Schema) with PERL
- Next by Date: Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- Previous by thread: Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- Next by thread: Re: bignum incompatible with looks_like_number() ???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|