Re: It's not PHP, is it? (potential new CPAN module)
- From: Colin von Heuring <unkempt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:35:17 -0700
Addendum
cvm Errata
I seem to have flamed the crap out of my boss in paragraph 3. To be fair to him, I'll point out that he's been the only developer until this year.
"Why not just use CGI?" I have two reasons. First, CGI uses some odd conventions that I find too limiting. Second, CGI starts a new Perl interpreter for each request. I'd rather run the risk of polluting the interpreter and get the extra performance.
It looks like I didn't proof the last 2 paragraphs of my message. Whoops. They still mean what I meant, though.
I forgot to ask: Is there an existing root-level namespace I should use for this? I've heard grumblings about all-caps module names. Is SDH going to be a problem? How about Apps::SDH (or whatever namespace comes out of the first question)? (I ask because I've read grumblings about package names that are all- or no-caps.)
Peas,
-CvH
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It's not PHP, is it? (potential new CPAN module)
- From: Ron Savage
- Re: It's not PHP, is it? (potential new CPAN module)
- References:
- It's not PHP, is it? (potential new CPAN module)
- From: Colin von Heuring
- It's not PHP, is it? (potential new CPAN module)
- Prev by Date: Re: update framework
- Next by Date: Re: Problem creating envelope-from in module Email::Send
- Previous by thread: It's not PHP, is it? (potential new CPAN module)
- Next by thread: Re: It's not PHP, is it? (potential new CPAN module)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|