Re: How to follow a Java script link

Sergio Ulises Sanchez Buelna [SUS], on Thursday, May 5, 2005 at 11:40
(-0500 (CDT)) wrote the following:

SUS> follow_link (this one does not work for the same reason presented before) and
SUS> "javascript:mySubmit( 2, 're_search', 25) "
SUS> on this reference
SUS> <a href="javascript:mySubmit( 2, 're_search', 25) ">previous</a>

you have to know, how to javascript function create URL (where are
you redirected), after that, you can parse the source for javascript,
recreate the links and use $mech->get(). that's all

--

...m8s, cu l8r, Brano.

[Honest, Officer, it didn't look like that when I wrote it!]


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How to follow a Java script link
    ... SUS> follow_link (this one does not work for the same reason presented before) and ... SUS> on this reference ... how to javascript function create URL (where are ...
    (perl.beginners)
  • Re: So many Flaws should = Free SMS!
    ... I think we all understand that the reason MS gets dinged so much is due to ... We are using SUS. ... > Microsoft products is not because their software is not tested but because ... > administer the SMS system, its not as simple as plugging SMS in and let it ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • RE: postback in asp.net 2.0
    ... > pressed is the Enter key, cancels the default submit and simulates a click on ... > into your ASPX pages, or that you can paste into a separate .js file, ... > pass a reference to the default button: ... >> there is no need to write a _dopostback javascript function. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: standalone 2003 to active directory
    ... > For using SUS client's machine not need any authentication. ... Sounds reasonable, I can't see a reason why it wouldn't work. ... if you're not planning on using SBS then a better ... option would be buying Standard, you'll find a lot of "limitations" in ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • monitoring GPO
    ... I have set up a OU policy for SUS but for some reason I dont think it is ... applying to all machines it should. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.group_policy)