RE: Camel book relevance
- From: juan.gomez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Juan Gomez)
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:32:08 -0500
Thanks for the info
I for now on only Perl
:o)
Armando Gomez Guajardo
Process Engineer
Work Ph 956 547 6438
Beeper 956 768 4070
-----Original Message-----
From: Wiggins d'Anconia [mailto:wiggins@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 1:15 AM
To: Gomez, Juan
Cc: Gonzillaaa; beginners@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Camel book relevance
Please bottom post...
Gomez, Juan wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I am a beginner too
>
> and can tell you this I use PERL a lot, I work with a lot of data and
> PERL helps me to manage all the data, I have started doing some CGI
> programming with it and it is great now all the text mode information
> I can put it in a web page for me it has work i think it would work
> for you
>
"Perl" or "perl", but never "PERL". The first is the general name for
the language. The second is usually used in reference to the
interpreter.
http://danconia.org
>
> cheers
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news on behalf of Gonzillaaa
> Sent: Sun 9/25/2005 1:50 AM
> To: beginners@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Camel book relevance
>
> Hello, another beginner looking for a book...
>
> Only this time I'm pretty much decided by the "Camel book" I just
> wanted to know how relevant you guys think is it for Perl today...
> What I mean is how much the language has evolved since the book was
> last published and if that change has render it "irrelevant" in some
areas.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Camel book relevance
- Next by Date: Good Intro reading
- Previous by thread: Re: Camel book relevance
- Next by thread: problem with using socket
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|