Re: does rename have problems on W2K, W Server 2003, etc?
- From: eddythejekyll@xxxxxxxxx (Ed)
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 08:20:57 -0600
Dr. Ruud,
" See 000a01c66062$670d1550$0202a8c0@charles">news:000a01c66062$670d1550$0202a8c0@charles
(that Message-ID is far from RFC compliant)"
Say what?
On 4/15/06, Dr.Ruud <rvtol+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ed schreef:
I took the section of code and ran it from the command line and it
works fine, so it must be something having to do with it being run by
the server?
See 000a01c66062$670d1550$0202a8c0@charles">news:000a01c66062$670d1550$0202a8c0@charles
(that Message-ID is far from RFC compliant)
--
Affijn, Ruud
"Gewoon is een tijger."
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-help@xxxxxxxx
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
--
Ed
.
- References:
- RE: does rename have problems on W2K, W Server 2003, etc?
- From: David --- Senior Programmer Analyst --- WGO Wagner
- Re: does rename have problems on W2K, W Server 2003, etc?
- From: Ed
- RE: does rename have problems on W2K, W Server 2003, etc?
- Prev by Date: RE: reference to a hash
- Next by Date: "use warnings" not working in Perl 5.8.8
- Previous by thread: Re: does rename have problems on W2K, W Server 2003, etc?
- Next by thread: How to use proxy with LWP?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|