references header Was: Chomp method

On Thursday 27 April 2006 14:23, you(Richard.Copits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
I'd have to say that I disagree with this approach - as mentioned by
several people here...

I must say you have a point, but it would be *a lot* easier to understand what
you disagree with if you choose (at least) one of the following aproaches:

1. quote what you are answering, and replying beneath it.
2. set your email client to include a propper References-header, so you don't
start a new thread each time you post to the list.

Please consider this as a friendly reminder.

--
Bjørge Solli
.