Re: address translation
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:11 PM, J. Peng <peng.kyo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:03 PM, John W. Krahn <krahnj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So 0xffffffff would indicate a network with no hosts on it and thus it
> is not a valid netmask.
>
yup, but sometime we need a 255.255.255.255 netmask to forbit the host
don't reply to any ARP requests.
sorry please s/forbit/force/;
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: address translation
... So 0xffffffff would indicate a network with no hosts on it and thus it ... is not a valid netmask. ... for example, you have the realservers behind the LVS, if the LVS is ... and let the hosts don't reply any arp requests to that VIP. ...
(perl.beginners) - Re: Heavyweight Network Mapping Tools
... multiple threads so as not to adversely effect any individual sub network ... The goals for the OPTE project are slightly ... >> Hosts alive through ICMP ... I was loooking more for the vulnerability scanning approach without ...
(Pen-Test) - Re: Scanning Class A network
... > within the network to identify hosts and ports exposed to the ... ICMP was not allowed in the network ... ports for all IPs. ... Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! ...
(Pen-Test) - Very slow SMB performance on one interface of a multi-homed server
... one interface and a private gigabit network on the other. ... Of the seven hosts, four are Windows 2000 server and three are XP. ... Connections using the office LAN and, ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.networking) - Re: Very slow SMB performance on one interface of a multi-homed server
... Seven multi-homed hosts are connected to a fast ethernet office LAN on ... one interface and a private gigabit network on the other. ... Of the seven hosts, four are Windows 2000 server and three are XP. ... Connections using the office LAN and, ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.networking) |
|
