Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: shawnhcorey@xxxxxxxx ("Mr. Shawn H. Corey")
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:40:50 -0400
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 04:05 +0000, Rob Dixon wrote:
Mr. Shawn H. Corey wrote:
I don't have any serious objections to the way this list is run. I do object
to some actions individuals have taken. Such as lying. If no such poll
exists, don't claim that is does.
I am responding to this only because you have chosen to call me a liar. I am
not. The notion of a poll is your own invention and your argument is vacuous.
Please take your silly rudeness elsewhere.
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 01:20 +0000, Rob Dixon wrote:
bottom-posting being a de-facto standard on
this list, and despite a majority of subscribers expecting it and
preferring it,
How do you know what a majority of subscribers expect and prefer if you
don't ask them? Are you claiming some sort of mind-reading powers?
--
Just my 0.00000002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
Linux is obsolete.
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: "Chas. Owens"
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- References:
- Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: Brian
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: "Octavian Rasnita"
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: "Jenda Krynicky"
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: Jack Gates
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: Rob Dixon
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: "Mr. Shawn H. Corey"
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: Rob Dixon
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: Mr. Shawn H. Corey
- Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- From: Rob Dixon
- Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- Prev by Date: Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- Next by Date: Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- Previous by thread: Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- Next by thread: Re: Curly braces and the logic of PERL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|