Re: Signal Handling
From: Kristian Nielsen (kn_at_sifira.dk)
Date: 12/17/03
- Previous message: Nilanjan Das: "Question on Perl DBI/DBD for Oracle 9i"
- In reply to: Mahtaj Khamneian: "RE: Signal Handling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <dbi-users@perl.org> Date: 17 Dec 2003 08:56:19 +0100
"Khamneian, Mahtaj" <khamneianm@umsystem.edu> writes:
Not sure if it is relevant here (I couldn't find mention of the Perl
version in the thread), bu signal handling has changed between Perl 5.6
and 5.8. In Perl 5.6 signals are asynchronous (as in C), while in Perl
5.8 they are synchronous and only handled between Perl bytecode
instructions.
So unless DBD::Oracle does something special, I would expect in Perl 5.8
that signal handling is delayed until the XS code (such as execute) has
finished, which matches the behaviour you are seeing.
It should be possible in Perl 5.8 to switch back to the old 5.6 (unsafe)
signal handling mode for immediate signal handling (not sure of the
details).
What would be interesting is if DBD::Oracle could be extended to handle
signals explicitly to enable safe aborting of DBI operations. Not sure
what that would involve, though.
- Kristian.
-- Kristian Nielsen kn@sifira.dk Development Manager, Sifira A/S
- Previous message: Nilanjan Das: "Question on Perl DBI/DBD for Oracle 9i"
- In reply to: Mahtaj Khamneian: "RE: Signal Handling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]