RE: [DBI] RE: Correct way to deal with returned NULLs?
From: Rich Jesse (Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com)
Date: 04/26/04
- Next message: Tim Bunce: "Re: Problems with "tuple_status" in Informix"
- Previous message: Dave Cash: "Re: [DBI] RE: Correct way to deal with returned NULLs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: 'Dave Cash' <dave@gnofn.org> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:04:08 -0500
YES! I *knew* there was an FM I didn't R. :) Thanks for the pointer!
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse@quadtechworld.com QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Cash [mailto:dave@gnofn.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 12:43 PM
> To: Jesse, Rich
> Cc: 'Michael Ragsdale'; 'dbi-users@perl.org'
> Subject: Re: [DBI] RE: Correct way to deal with returned NULLs?
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Jesse, Rich wrote:
>
> > Thanks all for your responses. We went with Michael's
> answer for this
> > project, although I'd probably advocate the others that checked for
> > "defined" for the future.
>
> In the spirit of TMTOWTDI...
>
> I'm not sure, but I think the following is equivalent to Michael's
> solution:
>
> use warnings;
> no warnings qw(uninitialized);
>
> Not sure what version of Perl you're using, but this is a good read
> on warnings (from the 5.8.0 docs):
>
> http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.8.0/pod/perllexwarn.html
>
- Next message: Tim Bunce: "Re: Problems with "tuple_status" in Informix"
- Previous message: Dave Cash: "Re: [DBI] RE: Correct way to deal with returned NULLs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|