RE: :ODBC compile problem from v1.00 to 1.09 on RH73
From: Andrew McDonald (andym_at_spidereye.com)
Date: 06/23/04
- Previous message: Daniel L. Miller: "Firebird/Interbase DBD for Debian"
- In reply to: Jeff Urlwin: "RE: :ODBC compile problem from v1.00 to 1.09 on RH73"
- Next in thread: Jeff Urlwin: "RE: :ODBC compile problem from v1.00 to 1.09 on RH73"
- Reply: Jeff Urlwin: "RE: :ODBC compile problem from v1.00 to 1.09 on RH73"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Jeff Urlwin <jurlwin@esoftmatic.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:21:40 +1000
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 02:14, Jeff Urlwin wrote:
> > I noticed what looks like a typo bug in dbd-odbc 1.09. Line
> > 139 has 8/ instead of */ Is that the same in your version?
>
> Why don't we do this (er, the "royal we"). Can you get subversion and pull
> the latest so we are talking apples and apples? I *definitely* don't have
> an 8/ anywhere in the code.
Hi there,
Sorry it's taken me a while to respond. I haven't managed to fix it yet,
I just wanted to let you know that the above was a local braino. The 8/
is not in any official tarball I'm aware of.
I apologise for the noise.
Cheers
Andy
- Previous message: Daniel L. Miller: "Firebird/Interbase DBD for Debian"
- In reply to: Jeff Urlwin: "RE: :ODBC compile problem from v1.00 to 1.09 on RH73"
- Next in thread: Jeff Urlwin: "RE: :ODBC compile problem from v1.00 to 1.09 on RH73"
- Reply: Jeff Urlwin: "RE: :ODBC compile problem from v1.00 to 1.09 on RH73"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]