Using Oracle's Perl tree instead of OS supplied distribution...
From: Bill Costa (Bill.Costa_at_unh.edu)
Date: 02/19/05
- Previous message: Jon Lapham: "Re: elegent way to handle "pluggable" backend servers?"
- Next in thread: Scott T. Hildreth: "Re: Using Oracle's Perl tree instead of OS supplied distribution..."
- Reply: Scott T. Hildreth: "Re: Using Oracle's Perl tree instead of OS supplied distribution..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:11:27 -0500 (EST) To: dbi-users@perl.org
DBI Folks,
I found the following article:
http://www.cuddletech.com/articles/oracle/node50.html
which discusses using the Perl distribution that comes as part of
the Oracle 10g installation. I spent a few minutes following the
instructions but couldn't get it to work (Perl was not finding
core modules like 'English' and 'strict'). With enough digging
and tweaking I'm pretty sure I'd probably be able to figure out
what's wrong and fix it. But before I go down that road, my
question is...
In the context of hosting CGI/DBI applications, what would be the
pro's and con's of going with Oracle's distribution of Perl as
verses the version that ships with Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
Thanks in advance for insights on this.
...BC
-- +----------------------------[ Bill.Costa@UNH.EDU ]---+ | Bill Costa | | CIS/TCS -- 1 Leavitt Lane PHONE: +1-603-862-3056 | No good deed... | University of New Hampshire | goes unpunished. | Durham, NH 03824 USA | | | +-----------------[ http://pubpages.unh.edu/~wfc/ ]---+
- Previous message: Jon Lapham: "Re: elegent way to handle "pluggable" backend servers?"
- Next in thread: Scott T. Hildreth: "Re: Using Oracle's Perl tree instead of OS supplied distribution..."
- Reply: Scott T. Hildreth: "Re: Using Oracle's Perl tree instead of OS supplied distribution..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|