Re: [cgiapp] Re: Yet another callback system proposal
- From: ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ron Savage)
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 08:45:11 +1000
On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:17:09 -0400, Michael Graham wrote:
Hi Michael
> Anyway, as much as possible we're trying to make the architecture
> of the framework transparent and let people write normal
> CGI::Application programs (including cgiapp_init, cgiapp_prerun,
> etc.) without interference. Obviously they have to be aware that
> framework stuff is going on at the various phases, but the
> mechanics shouldn't get in their way.
Understood, but I'm getting uneasy about the sheer effort being put into hiding
the plugins. They _don't_ have to be invisible/transparent/whatever. They _do_
have to be reliable.
--
Cheers
Ron Savage, ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on 26/05/2005
http://savage.net.au/index.html
Let the record show: Microsoft is not an Australian company
.
- Prev by Date: Re: [cgiapp] Re: Yet another callback system proposal
- Next by Date: Trouble installing DBD::Sybase on Windows 2000 server
- Previous by thread: Re: [cgiapp] Re: Yet another callback system proposal
- Next by thread: Trouble installing DBD::Sybase on Windows 2000 server
- Index(es):
