Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- From: jochen.wiedmann@xxxxxxxxx (Jochen Wiedmann)
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:00:13 +0100
On 11/15/05, Tyler MacDonald <tyler@xxxxxx> wrote:
> But it's licensed under the GPL, so if I wrote my package using it,
> I would be encumbered by the GPL by proxy. :-/
You're most definitely using a real lot of modules, which are have
perl's dual license, one of them being the GPL.
Besides, open source authors typically tend to be open to questions
like "would it be possible to release the module under Perl's default
license instead"? Just try.
Jochen
--
Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
boat. (Mark Twain)
.
- References:
- undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- From: Tyler MacDonald
- Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- From: Tyler MacDonald
- Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- From: Tyler MacDonald
- Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- From: Tyler MacDonald
- undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- Prev by Date: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- Next by Date: Re: DBD::Oracle won't install for Oracle 10G XE
- Previous by thread: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- Next by thread: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|