Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: lembark@xxxxxxxxxxx (Steven Lembark)
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:12:12 -0500
> Umm, bind_columns is probably do-able if the DBI gave you a way to > access the current row array. Then you could just bind the new columns > to the old ones.
Any real odds?
Odds?
"Probably do-able"
Q1: How likely? Q2: Any timeframe?
-- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark@xxxxxxxxxxx 1 888 359 3508 .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Tim Bunce
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- References:
- Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Steven Lembark
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Tim Bunce
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Steven Lembark
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Tim Bunce
- Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- Prev by Date: Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- Next by Date: Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- Previous by thread: Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- Next by thread: Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- Index(es):