Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- From: matthew.persico@xxxxxxxxx (Matthew Persico)
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:26:10 -0500
On 1/27/06, Darren Duncan <darren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> Even if you can't move, its not like 5.8 is becoming a hard
> dependency, rather just a soft dependency, as I recall.
The minute Tim writes a piece of code with a construct that is new to
5.8 because
a) its cool
b) he can
c) its probably more effecient
that soft dependency gets real hard. If he says he's not supporting
5.6 then you cannot assume it will just work anyway.
--
Matthew O. Persico
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- From: Robert Hicks
- Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- References:
- Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- From: Ron Savage
- Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- Prev by Date: Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- Next by Date: Re: dbi::errstr error.
- Previous by thread: Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- Next by thread: Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- Index(es):
