Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Tim.Bunce@xxxxxxxxx (Tim Bunce)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:45:07 +0000
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:12:12PM -0500, Steven Lembark wrote:
>
> >>> Umm, bind_columns is probably do-able if the DBI gave you a way to
> >>> access the current row array. Then you could just bind the new columns
> >>> to the old ones.
> >>
> >>Any real odds?
> >
> >Odds?
>
> "Probably do-able"
>
> Q1: How likely?
> Q2: Any timeframe?
As soon as someone sends me a patch I'm happy with :)
But it occurs to me that you could call $row = $sth->_get_fbav;
(See perldoc DBI::DBD for details.) That'll have the side effect of
incrementing the row count for that $sth, but that's not a problem in
your situation.
Tim.
.
- References:
- Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Steven Lembark
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Tim Bunce
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Steven Lembark
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Tim Bunce
- Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- From: Steven Lembark
- Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- Prev by Date: Fatal error (SIGTERM) Garbage Collecting DBI handle
- Next by Date: Re: Future versions of DBI to require perl >= 5.8
- Previous by thread: Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- Next by thread: Re: Statement handle side effects of swap_inner_handle?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
