RE: Calling a PostgreSQL function via DBI
- From: christian.stalp@xxxxxx (Christian Stalp)
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:23:59 +0100 (MET)
I'm glad it worked.
However I'm still concerned with why you need the nonportable form of
??::text etc.
Is this because you are running a user defined function which has no
schema associated with it the way a regular table or view would?
Is there some way to make it more portable, i.e. not needing to specify
explicit types for columns?
-Will
Yes this is true. Its a PLpgsql-function. This runs only on PostgreSQL and I
think this "::type"-form is also only usable under postgreSQL?!? But I have
to do it this way. Its a project for the university, and its focus on
databases. So it doesn't has to be portable for other databases. It is
important that we become familiar with database-procedures.
Gruss Christian
--
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
.
- References:
- RE: Calling a PostgreSQL function via DBI
- From: Will Rutherdale
- RE: Calling a PostgreSQL function via DBI
- Prev by Date: RE: Calling a PostgreSQL function via DBI
- Next by Date: RE: Calling a PostgreSQL function via DBI
- Previous by thread: RE: Calling a PostgreSQL function via DBI
- Next by thread: RE: Calling a PostgreSQL function via DBI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
