Re: How should I connect via DBD::Oracle to efficiently obtain 2000+ simultaneous connections?

From: ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ron Savage)
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:43:15 +1100

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:02:26 +1100, Chris wrote:

Hi Chris

Doing some digging around, I discover that each Oracle connection
consumes 4megs of RAM when "doing nothing".

:-(.

It would seem that I will definitely need some kind of connection
pooling - does anyone disagree ?

Lateral thinking would suggest a smarter database server :-).

--
Cheers
Ron Savage, ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on 19/11/2006
http://savage.net.au/index.html
Let the record show: Microsoft is not an Australian company

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How should I connect via DBD::Oracle to efficiently obtain 2000+ simultaneous connections?
  - From: Peter J. Holzer

References:
- Re: How should I connect via DBD::Oracle to efficiently obtain 2000+ simultaneous connections?
  - From: Chris

Prev by Date: Out of memory during "large" request
Next by Date: Re: Out of memory during "large" request
Previous by thread: Re: How should I connect via DBD::Oracle to efficiently obtain 2000+ simultaneous connections?
Next by thread: Re: How should I connect via DBD::Oracle to efficiently obtain 2000+ simultaneous connections?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Oracle Bulk Bind / Execute_Array
... Lateral thinking suggests you might try generating a data file and using Oracle's bulk load facility to read that quickly... ... Ron Savage, ron@savage.net.au on 10/12/2004 ...
(perl.dbi.users)
Re: Setting RTS with Win32::SerialPort
... Lateral thinking: http://realterm.sourceforge.net/ ... Ron Savage, ron@savage.net.au on 16/02/2005 ... Microsoft is not an Australian company ...
(comp.lang.perl.misc)