RE: DBI 1.53 Compile Does not Pass Test on RHEL 3.0

William R. Mussatto wrote:
On Thu, February 22, 2007 15:35, Garrett, Philip \(MAN-Corporate\)
said:
Unless you plan to use DBI and threads in the same process, you can
ignore that test.

What is the impact of mod_apache if you are using threaded apache
server (vs. child spawning).

I'm not sure, but that falls outside the "unless" I posed.

Philip
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DBI 1.53 Compile Does not Pass Test on RHEL 3.0
    ... What is the impact of mod_apache if you are using threaded apache ... server (vs. child spawning). ...
    (perl.dbi.users)
  • Re: Replication Headache - Urgent please Assist!
    ... 1.Manually created a delegation for the child domain on our root server DNS ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Binding sources question in Vs2005
    ... happens is that the fill statements for the child tables get executed first ... the child tables get taken from the server (sql 2005 in my case) and that as ... the parent record is changed by the user as he runs the form, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • os.system(), HTTPServer, and finishing HTTP requests
    ... be waiting for more input until the child that is forked in the server ... allowing the original parent to return and leaving an orphaned child behind ... pid = os.fork ... I'm exiting. ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Root domain clients cannot lookup child domain clients
    ... forwarding from child to parent or parent to child or from any server that can't go external is not a problem. ... And it is not a requirement to forward to your ISP, if your DNS server can go outside and chase referrals. ... I wouldn't get rid of the forwarder, but I will NOT create forwarding from the parent back to the child because then we will have the loop that you mentioned. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)