Mercury <-> PDC Prolog
From: greim (greim_at_schleibinger.com)
Date: 11/18/03
- Next message: Fergus Henderson: "Re: determ and nondeterm"
- Previous message: Ilona: "determ and nondeterm"
- Next in thread: Fergus Henderson: "Re: Mercury <-> PDC Prolog"
- Reply: Fergus Henderson: "Re: Mercury <-> PDC Prolog"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:28:55 +0100
Hello,
i did a lot of work with Turbo/PDC prolog
years ago. In between i had to move to some more
practical things(Assembler.Perl.Pascal, Java etc.).
But i am still interested in prolog and
things arround, because i think it was
the best language i worked with.
One reaseon for example: most program sources became smaller
during the developement.
Today i read somethingt about Mercury, maybe a very fine
dialect ore follower of prolog.
I know most prolog gurus hate turbo/pdc-prolog, but
what is the real difference between mercury and the good old
turbo/pdc ?
You have to define your "functions", flow patterns, as well as an
determ/undeterm switch and both are based on the C language. Ok, mercury
has some more
modern extensions, but the idea behind is not real different, isn't it?
I know mercury is more portable, maybe faster etc. but thats not a real
difference
i think.
Regards
Markus Greim
P.S. I am not a computer scientist, only an engineer who has to work
with all this computers arround ;-)
- Next message: Fergus Henderson: "Re: determ and nondeterm"
- Previous message: Ilona: "determ and nondeterm"
- Next in thread: Fergus Henderson: "Re: Mercury <-> PDC Prolog"
- Reply: Fergus Henderson: "Re: Mercury <-> PDC Prolog"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|