Re: Egg on my face, I guess I still have trouble with declarative thinking at times.
From: Paul Singleton (paul.singleton_at_bcs.org.uk)
Date: 02/16/04
- Next message: Alfonso Esteban Gonzalez Sencion: "Representing data structures in Prolog"
- Previous message: chenyu: "newbie question: debugging technique"
- In reply to: Robert Oschler: "Re: Egg on my face, I guess I still have trouble with declarative thinking at times."
- Next in thread: Bart Demoen: "Re: Egg on my face, I guess I still have trouble with declarative thinking at times."
- Reply: Bart Demoen: "Re: Egg on my face, I guess I still have trouble with declarative thinking at times."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:35:14 +0000
Robert Oschler wrote:
> One of the reasons I love Prolog is that it is _so_ much easier to express
> extremely complex algorithms and complex logical relationships, than in any
> other language I have worked with.
and it is easier to *evolve* a prototype (good continuity
between design and implementation spaces, is how SE pundits
might put it?), especially if good coding practice is
followed.
NB (since we're talking productivity) surely there's huge
scope for refactoring support within an IDE (Eclipse?)
e.g. adding extra params, type checking, procedurising
chunks of code, ...
Paul Singleton
- Next message: Alfonso Esteban Gonzalez Sencion: "Representing data structures in Prolog"
- Previous message: chenyu: "newbie question: debugging technique"
- In reply to: Robert Oschler: "Re: Egg on my face, I guess I still have trouble with declarative thinking at times."
- Next in thread: Bart Demoen: "Re: Egg on my face, I guess I still have trouble with declarative thinking at times."
- Reply: Bart Demoen: "Re: Egg on my face, I guess I still have trouble with declarative thinking at times."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]