Prolog & Incompleteness
From: Jurgen Van Gael (jurgen.vangael_at_student.kuleuven.ac.be)
Date: 03/13/04
- Previous message: Yupar Nyo: "Tree Height in Prolog"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Prolog & Incompleteness"
- Reply: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Prolog & Incompleteness"
- Reply: Jamie Andrews; real address _at_ bottom of message: "Re: Prolog & Incompleteness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:59:02 +0100
Hi,
I have just started a prolog programming course this semester and this is
something which has been on my mind lately. Prolog tries to prove first
order predicate logic theorems given certain inference steps. As prolog
allows arithmetic it seems as if prolog logic has all necessary ingredients
to be subject to godel's incompleteness theorem. My question is if there
indeed are truths which prolog will never be able to prove or if certain
builtin assumptions (closed world, ...) free prolog of being incomplete.
looking forward for your replies,
Jurgen
- Previous message: Yupar Nyo: "Tree Height in Prolog"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Prolog & Incompleteness"
- Reply: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Prolog & Incompleteness"
- Reply: Jamie Andrews; real address _at_ bottom of message: "Re: Prolog & Incompleteness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]