Re: Sublists question
From: Bart Demoen (bmd_at_cs.kuleuven.ac.be)
Date: 03/27/04
- Next message: bart demoen: "Re: counting the number of backtracs"
- Previous message: alex: "How to parse expressions with parenthesis"
- In reply to: billh: "Re: Sublists question"
- Next in thread: no-spam: "Re: Sublists question"
- Reply: no-spam: "Re: Sublists question"
- Reply: zeus: "Re: Sublists question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:24:01 +0100
billh wrote:
> Not too bad, taking into consideration the fact that I am using a
> 400MHz AMD k6-3 cpu. I was frankly surprised to get any answers at all,
> and I look forward to seeing how well a "closed form" method of dealing
> with the general case performs in comparison.
Would you please be so kind as to provide us with the definitions of
sublist_i_k and is_sublist that you used.
I can write my own version of these pr4edicates, but I'd rather use yours
before I start reporting on a few "closed form" methods.
Cheers
Bart Demoen
- Next message: bart demoen: "Re: counting the number of backtracs"
- Previous message: alex: "How to parse expressions with parenthesis"
- In reply to: billh: "Re: Sublists question"
- Next in thread: no-spam: "Re: Sublists question"
- Reply: no-spam: "Re: Sublists question"
- Reply: zeus: "Re: Sublists question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]