Working on different databases
From: Maciek (maksz_at_poczta.onet.pl)
Date: 04/23/04
- Previous message: Paulo Moura: "Re: Simulating inheritance with a metainterpreter"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Working on different databases"
- Reply: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Working on different databases"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Apr 2004 17:43:28 -0700
My situation is like that: I work on one, let's say basic database.
There are most important facts in there. But sometimes, when I have no
solution I want to support by the "less important" facts. My idea is
to place them in diffrent database and use only if there is no other
way of achieving the goal. What you think? Is it any elegant way of
doing that, or maybe there is another, better solution?
Asserting and retracting is not a way of doing that I think, as there
are too many of these facts and they're not result from any rules.
Besides that, after using a fact from the "supporting" database I'd
like to take into account the "basic" one only in the next subgoal
unless I can't find any solutions.
I hope it's clear, if not or it's totally wrong question - forgive me
I'm not too experienced in that problem.
Thanx in advance,
Maciek
- Previous message: Paulo Moura: "Re: Simulating inheritance with a metainterpreter"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Working on different databases"
- Reply: Benjamin Johnston: "Re: Working on different databases"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|