Writing to standard error from gnu-prolog
From: Roger Clayton (see_at_below.for.email)
Date: 04/26/04
- Next message: Petra Hofstedt: "CFP. MultiCPL'04: Multiparadigm Constraint Programming Languages"
- Previous message: Lex Spoon: "Re: Simulating inheritance with a metainterpreter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:41:51 +1200
So here's the problem:
I need to report a message to the standard error stream
rather than the standard output in a gnu-prolog program.
(The program I writing is part of a compiler for a logic
programming language).
Although the gnu-prolog manual is excellent in most
respects, I'm having trouble finding the sequence of
builtin predicates to make this happen.
When the interactive environment is consulted for
available output streams, the results are:
------------
| ?- current_stream(X), current_alias(X,Y).
X = '$stream'(0)
Y = top_level_input ? ;
X = '$stream'(0)
Y = user_input ? ;
X = '$stream'(0)
Y = debugger_input ? ;
X = '$stream'(1)
Y = top_level_output ? ;
X = '$stream'(1)
Y = user_output ? ;
X = '$stream'(1)
Y = debugger_output
yes
--------
The fact that all the output aliases point to stream 1
makes me suspect that these are the same stream and,
moreover, none of these are actually labeled as the
standard error.
Any attempt to set the stream (using set_output/1) to
anything other than '$stream'(1) generates an
'existence error'. New streams generated using the
open/3 or open/4 predicates seem only to create output
files.
I hope someone out there has had some experience with
this and can point me in the right direction to make
this happen.
Thanks,
Roger Clayton
<merge these lines for email address>
rjc4 .waikato .nz
@cs .ac
- Next message: Petra Hofstedt: "CFP. MultiCPL'04: Multiparadigm Constraint Programming Languages"
- Previous message: Lex Spoon: "Re: Simulating inheritance with a metainterpreter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|