Re: output **no What's wrong here?

From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 05/10/04 

Date: 10 May 2004 19:33:28 +0200

"Nameless" <news.mail@chello.no> writes:

> I think it's safe to say
> that you refuse to acknowledge the context of Demoen's
> posting in an attempt to justify your own reply.

  I see that I need to be more explicit! Let us stipulate that Bart
Demoen is a very demon of perversity, motivated by pure malice, evil
to the core. Still any factual comment posted in public on Dudley's
code remains pure and innocent, completely justified by Dudley's
presenting his code to the public.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New A C Grayling book
    ... can you justify this or perhaps point me to ... It sounds the same as the tree falling ... introduce so much context that you can easily define and show the ... about Earth, evolution or life forms, and at a much more fundamental ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: output **no Whats wrong here?
    ... >> posting in an attempt to justify your own reply. ... > by pure malice, evil to the core. ... The context is all important, ... innocent, malicious or anything else. ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)
  • Re: different link colors
    ... differently for attractiveness to small children would more than justify ... wise depending on the context. ... People differ in what they find easy or confusing. ... It would not surprise me that others would too ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: movin on
    ... > There's no direct connection between the Kook Faq and any of my ... > been using to justify attacking my wife and my publisher. ... > another and then posting the results. ... > whining about your real name being on the Kook Faq. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Bad and Dishonest Doctors
    ... > It's amazing what people can justify with passages from ... > taken out of context. ... I'm a Christian, and I have to say, ...
    (misc.health.diabetes)