Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog
From: Bart Demoen (bmd_at_cs.kuleuven.ac.be)
Date: 08/17/04
- Next message: Pere Montolio: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- Previous message: Nameless: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- In reply to: Nameless: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- Next in thread: Pere Montolio: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:32:20 +0200
Nameless wrote:
> No, you're just trying to be difficult (as usual).
If you ask a solution for a problem without the explicit mentioning
that it needs properties rational and effective, people in this
newsgroup (especially me) are inclined to deliver answers with
those properties. By explicitly mentioning them as requirements,
you make it sound like a trick question, that's why I asked.
But let's focus on the questions and not on their epitheton ornans.
You ask how to do bitewise not ... how is bitwise not different
from what \ does in ISO ? An example would be welcome.
xor(X,Y,Result) :- Result is (X /\ \Y) \/ ((\X) /\ Y).
Is that ok for you ?
> In fact, I'd really prefer that _you_ didn't reply
> to any of my messages
Once you put your message in a newsgroup, it is no longer
yours. Especially if you are nameless.
Cheers
Bart Demoen
- Next message: Pere Montolio: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- Previous message: Nameless: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- In reply to: Nameless: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- Next in thread: Pere Montolio: "Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|