Re: Bit-manipulation in ISO Prolog

From: Jens Kilian (Jens_Kilian_at_agilent.com)
Date: 08/17/04 

Date: 17 Aug 2004 16:26:49 +0200

"Nameless" <news.mail@chello.no> writes:
> Which is all the more reason to wonder why ISO Prolog lacks 'xor'.

I suspect that the committee just couldn't come up with a symbolic operator
they liked :-) 

-- 
mailto:jjk@acm.org                 phone:+49-7031-464-7698 (TELNET 778-7698)
  http://www.bawue.de/~jjk/          fax:+49-7031-464-7351
                                   As the air to a bird, or the sea to a fish,
                                   so is contempt to the contemptible. [Blake]

Relevant Pages