Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Joe Wright: "League or tournament examples"
- Previous message: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- In reply to: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 17 Mar 2005 17:14:58 +0100
Matthew Huntbach <mmh@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> writes:
> But one of its main selling points when it was first developed was
> that it would be easier and more natural for humans to use than other
> programming languages!
That was in the old days! Esperanto may be no more easy or natural
than Klingon, but both are quite useful.
- Next message: Joe Wright: "League or tournament examples"
- Previous message: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- In reply to: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|