Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)
From: alex goldman (hello_at_spamm.er)
Date: 03/22/05
- Previous message: Nameless: "Re: Minsky still posting"
- In reply to: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Next in thread: Stephen Harris: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Reply: Stephen Harris: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Reply: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:52:18 -0800
Matthew Huntbach wrote:
> So, yes, good, Prolog has a role in ILP. But there is more to AI than
> ILP.
Since you are/were interested in ILP and also seem to be in the business of
inventing new, better Prologs, I'll take this opportunity to ask: what are
your thoughts, if any, on Mercury, Goedel, lambda-Prolog and their
potential suitability for ILP?
- Previous message: Nameless: "Re: Minsky still posting"
- In reply to: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Next in thread: Stephen Harris: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Reply: Stephen Harris: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Reply: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: Is Prolog good for AI? (was: Minsky still posting)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]